Zurück zum Vorlesungsverzeichnis
Uni-München
14. März 2017

Fortgeschrittenenseminar The ethics of violence Blockseminar im November in Venedig Anmeldung bis Ende August

Paradigmatic moral norms (-Thou shalt not kill”) set limits to violent behaviour and many ethical theories see a breakdown of moral regulation as a main cause of violence. They attribute it to a breakdown of moral self-control, to a failure...

Erstelle deinen persönlichen Lernplan

Wir helfen dir, diesen Kurs optimal vorzubereiten — mit einem individuellen Lernplan, Tipps und passenden Ressourcen.

Jetzt Lernplan erstellen
Paradigmatic moral norms (-Thou shalt not kill”) set limits to violent behaviour and many ethical theories see a breakdown of moral regulation as a main cause of violence. They attribute it to a breakdown of moral self-control, to a failure of the moral sense, to a lack of moral judgment or to moral disengagement. From an anthropological perspective, this line of thought is at least incomplete. Although all moral systems contain norms that prohibit certain types of violence, there is good evidence that much (or almost all) violence is morally motivated; it is based on moral judgment and requires self-control (cf. Rai and Fiske 2011). Honour killings are impressive examples of morally motivated violence. More generally, punishing of moral transgressors is the most typical case of morally motivated violence. In modern societies, the state has usually monopolized the use of physical violence, which may be the reason why we find it difficult to see the link between private morality and violence. In the seminar we will scrutinize Fiske’s anthropological theory that regards morality as a mechanism of relationship regulation, which systematically requires violence on part of moral agents. We will use aggressive behaviour in school bullying as a test-case for the theory. More specifically, we will ask whether certain bullying behaviours can be explained as morally motivated violence that stabilizes social relationships (e.g. dominance structures). As bullies often use pseudo-moral arguments to justify their behaviour, it is not implausible to assume that they manage to frame their aggression as morally justified punishment serving the group. We will discuss representative texts from recent bullying research. Finally, we will discuss implications for the normative evaluation of bullying behaviour and for moral education. Descriptive theories from anthropology and social psychology do not forestall ethical judgment, but they may substantially inform it. von Grundherr, Michael , Dr. The seminar is open to advanced students with a background in psychology, philosophy or related disciplines term paper OR (presentation(s)+essay/record), according to the lecturer's specification (= BA and general MA program in philosophy); equivalent forms of assessment by arrangement [9 ECTS-points] LMU München WiSe 1415 apl.Prof.Dr. Sellmaier Stephan